Forum:Individual Castles
Topic:Shirburn Castle, Oxfordshire, England
Want to register?
Who Can Post? Any registered users may post a reply.
About Registration You must be registered in order to post a topic or reply in this forum.
Posting Tips: You will receive a much better response to your questions if you include your age and as much detail as possible. Both of these things allows a person to give you an answer specific to your question and age group.
Your UserName:
Your Password:   Forget your password?
Message Icon:                                           
                                          
                                          
Your Reply:


*HTML is OFF
*UBB Code is ON
[IMG] UBB Code Not Allowed!

Options Show Signature: include your profile signature. Only registered users may have signatures.

If you have previously registered, but forgotten your password, click here.

*If HTML and/or UBB Code are enabled, this means you can use HTML and/or UBB Code in your message.

T O P I C     R E V I E W
AJRFrom a newspaper article dated 25th July 2003
Earl loses fight to stay in castle
A lord and his lady are facing the prospect of being thrown out of the "sleeping beauty" castle that has been the family home for almost three centuries.
The 9th Earl of Macclesfield and his wife Sandra were told by a high court judge yesterday that they had failed in their fight to remain at the 40-room moated Shirburn Castle in the Vale of Oxford for the rest of the earl's life. In a judgment which marked the culmination of a series of bitter family disputes, Mr Justice Lewison ruled they can be required to vacate the 14th century castle on two years' notice.
He added: "It seems to me that, with goodwill and sincere cooperation on both sides, it would have been possible for a solution to be reached which would give Lord and Lady Macclesfield a home within the castle, even if not in the whole of it."
The earl's claim was contested by the firm that owns the estate near Watlington, the Beechwood Estates Company, which is largely owned by his relatives.
Meanwhile, the future of the castle, which houses valuable paintings, arms and armour and three libraries, remains uncertain.
The judge said it had been described by an expert witness as "a sleeping beauty of a castle ... It retains much of the detritus of past generations and is therefore a time capsule as it stands".
He added: "Little has been done to it, probably for a century. The electrical system has failed and most of the castle is plunged into darkness at nightfall."
Lawyers for the earl said the family had been riven by disputes since the mid-1980s.
The estimated cost of repairs is £2.6m and it is reckoned that 50,000 visitors a year would be required to make it pay as a tourist attraction.

Contact Us | Castles on the Web

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board (UltimateBB), Version 5.40
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998-1999.



Castles on the WebHome
Castles on the WebIntroduction
Castles on the WebCastle Quest
Castles on the WebSite of the Day
Castles on the WebCastle Tours
Castles on the WebCastle Collections
Castles on the WebNew Sites
Castles on the WebPopular Sites
Castles on the WebPhoto Archive
Castles on the WebMiscellaneous
Castles on the WebCastles for Kids
Castles on the WebCastle Glossary
Castles on the WebPalaces & Homes
Castles on the WebMedieval Studies
Castles on the WebAccommodations
Castles on the WebTop Rated
Castles on the WebCastle Postcards
Castles on the WebHeraldry Links
Castles on the WebMyths & Legends
Castles on the WebOrganizations
Castles on the WebCastle Books
Castles on the WebAbbeys & Churches
Castles on the WebWeapons/Supplies
Castles on the WebRandom Site
Castles on the WebAdd A Castle Site
Castles on the WebAcknowledgements
Castles on the WebSearch Options
Castles on the WebPlease Help Us!
Castles on the WebPlease Link To Us
Castles on the WebContact Us

Castles on the Web Copyright 1995- | Privacy Policy