UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
  Castle Quest
  Castles In General & Medieval History
  Bridgenorth

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Bridgenorth
Peter
Member
posted 03-15-2001 11:58 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Peter   Click Here to Email Peter     Edit/Delete Message
U.K. TV viewers:
Did anyone catch CH4's 'Time Team', this last week on Bridgenorth.
The townspeople had asked the team to give them an idea of what their town layout was in medieval times. Seeing that all that is left is part of leaning keep.
It was most interesting, with parts of the bailey wall being found about the town, perehaps the footings of tower in someone's back garden, and were some of the ditches lay.
One thing I couldn't work out is, why the towngate was never mentioned or shown !
Okay, so it is renovated to heck, but it does stand where the original gate was. Comments if anyone else did catch. If you didn't, watch out for a rerun.

Philip Davis
unregistered
posted 03-15-2001 01:29 PM           Edit/Delete Message
It was indeed an interesting programme much marred by media hype and apparent belief that archaeology means digging holes. As usual most of the interesting finds were found above ground by Stewart's careful observation of typography and maps (Though, to be honest, on this occassion he found little that wasn't actually already known.) The trenches dug actually produced little that couldn't and wasn't discovered by geophysics and much less damaging core holes (It's worth remembering that those large trenches are now going to be filled in and will completely useless for archaeological study in the future with, perhaps more sophisticated techniques.)
The only worthwhile trench was, as you say Peter, the one dug by Cerenza and based on good above ground remains of the bailey wall.
Tony Robinson can sometimes add to a programme but on this programme his constant demands for trenches and finds really detracted from the show. Obviously it's nice if an artifact that increases the understanding of a site is found but it is the understanding that is important in archaeology not the artifact (That's called treasure hunting). Trying to contrive a find is, in my opinion, not only poor archaeology is false and bad television.
What was really good though was the interpretation of the keep (above ground archaeology again) The suggestion of the keep being a constables tower guarding both the entry into the inner bailey and the inner royal ward was fascinating and, as far as I can see, a new intrepretation.

However for those who didn't catch the show some of the feel of it can be found online at http://www.channel4.com/nextstep/timeteam/2001bri.html (I imagine their link to my site my disappear after these comments!)

------------------
And the astronomyours beheldyne the constellacions of hys bryth by thare castle, and foundyn that he sholde bene wyse and curteyse, good of consaill
Secreta Secretorum

Visit Castellarium Philippis


Philip Davis
unregistered
posted 03-15-2001 01:33 PM           Edit/Delete Message
Oh and I suppose the reason the town gate wasn't mentioned was that the programme was about the castle and not the town defences this may be a bit of an artificial division since they are closely combined but I suppose you have to limit things somehow.

Peter
Member
posted 03-16-2001 11:12 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Peter   Click Here to Email Peter     Edit/Delete Message
Points taken Phil:
Yes, Robinson seemed to be in fret for much of the programme, and did detract from it.
We didn't mention the siege engine hurled up to the top of Panpuddin' Hill. Perhaps firing flaring pineapples in the wrong direction summed up a lot of the programme. The Sealed Knot team on the same site with their cannon was somewhat better. Giving a good insight into what five\six cannons in the same spot would have done to the site.
Phil Dixon certainly did a good job on the keep\tower break down. And the final impression of the whole site seemed pretty good.

All times are PT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Castles on the Web

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.40
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 1999.



Castles on the WebHome
Castles on the WebIntroduction
Castles on the WebCastle Quest
Castles on the WebSite of the Day
Castles on the WebCastle Tours
Castles on the WebCastle Collections
Castles on the WebNew Sites
Castles on the WebPopular Sites
Castles on the WebPhoto Archive
Castles on the WebMiscellaneous
Castles on the WebCastles for Kids
Castles on the WebCastle Glossary
Castles on the WebPalaces & Homes
Castles on the WebMedieval Studies
Castles on the WebAccommodations
Castles on the WebTop Rated
Castles on the WebCastle Postcards
Castles on the WebHeraldry Links
Castles on the WebMyths & Legends
Castles on the WebOrganizations
Castles on the WebCastle Books
Castles on the WebAbbeys & Churches
Castles on the WebWeapons/Supplies
Castles on the WebRandom Site
Castles on the WebAdd A Castle Site
Castles on the WebAcknowledgements
Castles on the WebSearch Options
Castles on the WebPlease Help Us!
Castles on the WebPlease Link To Us
Castles on the WebContact Us

Castles on the Web Copyright 1995- | Privacy Policy