|
*If HTML and/or UBB Code are enabled, this means you can use HTML and/or UBB Code in your message.
As for walls built directly behind eachother, I have never come across one. The walls of Constantinople(Byznatium, Istanbul) are the only triple walls I know of. I can think of a couple of reasons they were not common. Secondly, the outside wall of a set was always shorter than the inside wall to allow defenders on the inner wall to shoot over the outer wall, and also to have an advantage over it if it was breached or taken. This would mean that a third wall, having to be shorter than the second, would either be very short, or the other two walls would have to be built higher at great extra cost.What??? Is it a good idea or not??Why though its added protection??? Erik Schmidt There are some castles that have three walls, but not directly behind eachother. These walls were built as the castle grew and needed to(or could) expand.
Firstly, if you had two walls, that was generally enough and you didn't get much extra protection from the effort and cost of building a third. Extra effort was generally expended on earthworks(moats, ditches, mounds and holes) outside the walls instead.
In fact, the third wall at Constantinople is very short, but was once preceded by a large moat.
Powered by:
Ultimate Bulletin Board (UltimateBB), Version 5.40
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998-1999.